I find generative AI models (mostly LLMs) extremely useful in many situations. I use them particularly heavily for writing software and internet research (if you haven’t tried Deep Research, Claude Research, etc., you are missing out) as well as, like many other people, for requesting explanations of complicated ideas, brainstorming, or summarizing things. I’ve also recently been involved in integrating them into RemNote to generate flashcards and assess understanding.
However, my default policy is that I never use LLMs to write English text. If I write to you, or you read something I have written on the web – blog posts, M2 tiddlers, emails, etc. – all of the words except for quotations are written directly by me. If this is ever not the case, I will include a prominent disclaimer indicating that the content was partly written by AI. (So far, the only place I’ve done this is in technical software documentation, where I might allow Claude Code to make an update to the docs along with a code change. Even then, I usually prefer to do it myself.)
I do sometimes use LLMs to do research that I later incorporate into my writing, or to proofread or review my writing for factual or grammatical errors. But I never let an LLM write new text for me, and I don’t accept large chunks of suggested changes or fixes into my work or allow LLMs to directly change it; at most, it might suggest an obvious change of a couple of words and I might manually apply it.
I have at least three reasons for this policy:
Part of the ai page movement. Last updated March 15, 2026.